Finding the right tests…
Emergency services available 24 x 7
Emergency services available 24 x 7
Finding the right tests…
X-Ray
Two ankles, each captured from the front and the side, are ordered together mainly for one reason: comparison. In a child with a suspected growth-plate injury, a fracture through the still-forming cartilage can be almost invisible on a single film, so doctors compare the injured ankle against the normal side to spot subtle widening or a small step in the growth plate that would otherwise be missed. Adults occasionally have both ankles imaged too, when swelling, pain, or a suspected symmetric condition affects both joints and a doctor wants to see how one side's bone changes stack up directly against the other.
Each ankle gets its own AP and lateral pair, four images in total, read side by side rather than in isolation. The comparison is what matters here: a subtle finding on the injured side, such as a slightly wider growth plate or faint swelling, is easier to confirm once it's set next to the normal-looking bone on the other ankle.
A single ankle X-ray in a child can look deceptively normal even with a real fracture, because a young ankle's growth plate is still cartilage and not yet solid bone. Radiology references describe imaging the opposite, unaffected ankle specifically to catch subtle physeal widening or displacement that would be easy to miss without a normal reference image next to it.
Outside of growth-plate concerns, a doctor might order both ankles when pain, swelling, or joint changes appear on both sides and a direct left-to-right comparison, of joint space, bone density, or alignment, is useful for tracking a condition rather than diagnosing a single injury.
Imaging both ankles roughly doubles the radiation and the appointment time compared to a single ankle, which is why it's reserved for cases where the comparison itself adds real diagnostic value, not ordered routinely for every ankle injury.
A child's growth plate is still cartilage, so a fracture through it can look nearly normal on a single film. Comparing the injured ankle against the uninjured one makes subtle changes, like a widened growth plate, much easier to spot.
Not necessarily. Ordering both sides is a diagnostic strategy for hard-to-see injuries, not a sign that the injury itself is worse than a single-ankle X-ray would suggest.
Each ankle receives its own low, carefully controlled dose, and staff use the smallest amount needed for a clear image. Tell the technologist about any recent X-rays your child has had so they can keep track of overall exposure.
This page is general information about the test, not medical advice. Your own report's reference ranges apply — please discuss your results with your doctor.
Yes, though less often than in children. It's used when a doctor wants to directly compare bone changes, swelling, or alignment between two symptomatic ankles rather than assess a single acute injury.
Yes, since four images are taken instead of two. The appointment is still generally brief, just roughly double the positioning time of a single-ankle study.
No. If both X-rays look normal but a growth-plate or soft-tissue injury is still suspected, your doctor may still move to an MRI, which shows cartilage and soft tissue that X-rays cannot.
Yes, always tell the technologist and describe your symptoms accurately. Even though both ankles are imaged, your doctor still needs to know which side is symptomatic to interpret the comparison correctly.